Reading the account of how and why the May 7th action occurred and
what happened, more than ever, I am glad I have disciplined myself to
write my own history. Who knows better than I, why, how and what happened
where I am involved in making the event happen.
I heard on Rev. Sharpton’s broadcast Saturday, May 9th, Mr. Paul
Washington of the Vulcan Society, express disappointment because of
what happened at the Brooklyn Bridge. Yet, what happened at the Bridge
is precisely what we had planned. We had told participants what would
happen before we got to the Bridge. It was never our intention to cross
the Bridge or get arrested at the Bridge. We had intended to pause at
the Bridge to tie up traffic. We knew Rev. Sharpton had tied up the
Bridge on the Manhattan side. Our objective was to tie up as many streets
and bridges as we could and get arrested at the Manhattan Bridge. But
more about that later. Let me first back up and start in the courtroom.
On Monday, April 14, 2008, I arrived at the court at 7:15am. I had breakfast,
an egg and home fries, at the restaurant across the street from the
court. (Later, I became ill. I believe it was due to my departing from
my usual breakfast.) While waiting in the restaurant, Isnora came in
surrounded by hefty white police officers. It was the closest view I
had gotten of him. He was chucky with a round baby face.
Around 8:30am, Rev. Sharpton, Attorneys Michael Hardy and Sanford Rubenstein,
Dominick, Sharpton’s daughter, Rachel, Sharpton’s public
relations coordinator had assembled in front of the restaurant. Rev.
Sharpton inquired the whereabouts of Nicole. “She's on the way,”
came the response. We crossed the street as Nicole drove up. As she
disembarked from her car, we went to meet her in the middle of the street.
She was smiling faintly. She embraced everyone and we started toward
the courthouse. The press had crowded on the sidewalk. We walked passed
the throng, up the steps, through the doors, passed security and then
the last stationary TV and still camera into the courtroom.
The Bell family was already seated. The judge had not arrived, which
allowed people to stand around talking softly. Suspense was in the air.
Consistently, at 9:00am the booming voice announced court was now in
All three (3) defense attorneys, James Culleton, representing Det. Michael
Oliver, Paul Martin, representing Det. Marc Cooper and Anthony Ricco,
representing Det. Gescard Isnora, repeated the argument they had been
making from the beginning of the trial. They claimed the officers identified
themselves, took cover and fired their weapons. Detective Marc Cooper,
who claimed he had been hit by the car driven by Sean Bell and who fired
4 times, fired first because he thought Joe Guzman had raised his arm
as if he had a gun. Isnora, who fired 11 times and Oliver, who fired
31 times and whose bullets caused the death of Sean, claimed that they
thought they were been fired upon. And the attorneys highlighted the
criminal background and anti-social history of all Bells friends.
The black (pigmentation that is) attorney, Mr. Ricco, was particularly
vicious in his attacks, not only on Sean Bell and his friends, but also
on black leaders, Bell supporters, black attorneys, the black community
and the even the press. His insensitivity was cruel and malicious. His
depiction of Bell and friends was unnecessary and drove a dagger into
the heart of the Bell family. Daily I watched the family writhing in
pain. This wasn’t a jury trial, the judge had the material, and
there was no need for the vulgar characterization and graphic depictions.
Attorney Culleton called Bell’s friends “a parade of convicted
felons, “crack dealers” and “men who were no strangers
to weapons.” Another attorney said, “they sat on the witness
stand in rented suits,” borrowed suits and cried crocodile tears,
their image was prepared for the court” in fact it was said of
Joe Guzman, who was shot multiple times still have 4 bullets in his
body and will never be the same, “Joe Guzman is the reason we
are here today.” What an incredible statement, I thought to myself.
This man, with one of his friends dead, another wounded, having committed
no crime, sitting in a car of which no weapon or illegal substance were
found, trying to get home, ends up with a body full of bullets, and
he’s the cause of it all.
I thought that they overplayed some of the details from the crime scene.,
i.e. bloodstained clothing, blood on the seat of the car, the weapons,
not only were these shown on a huge screen against the wall, but they
were shown from many angles and the focus was sustained for long periods
In the afternoon, the Assistant DA, Charles Testagrossa, argued that
Isnora account was a fabrication and argued that the cops used excessive
force. He said that Oliver and Isnora did not believe the threat of
return fire was real because they did not take cover.
When it was all over, Judge Arthur Cooperman announced that he would
render his decision on April 25th. So, just like that, after months,
the long awaited trial was over. It was all in the hands or head of
a tall, long-faced white man. Or was it in the hands of God? Time will
At lunch time press conference, Mr. Bell angrily asked, “Why isn’t
the victim’s family being given consideration?” Attorney
Hardy made the argument he had been making almost every day at the press
conference. The defense case is without merit as evidence by their focus
on the background of the victims and their friends. The DA has met the
burden of proof. For the first time I spoke to the press. I assailed
Mr. Ricco for his vile, vicious portrayal of the victim and their friends.
After the trial, Mrs. Bell thanked the DA. There had been questions
raised by the Attorney Neville Mitchell, that the DA was presenting
a weak case.
Significantly, the biggest concern expressed by white leaders and opinion
makers was what will happen if the decision exonerates the cops. Rev.
Sharpton, I think, gave the appropriate response. “First, we believe
that the officers will be found guilty. Even so, why come to us. We
are the victims. Go to the police officers; ask them what they will
The usual, cops can-do-no-wrong crowd had immediately began the defense
of the cops. The cops they said we justified in firing 50 bullets in
a vehicle containing 3 unarmed black men because they thought one of
them had a gun. How many times have I hear that argument? “I thought
he had a gun, or a shiny object, or he went into his pocket.”
And, incredibly, it works for them. Usually, there is an acquittal.
No matter how clearly the killing was unjustified, all cops have to
do is say the aforementioned. Then they question the background of the
victims if there is nothing “shady” you make something up
or connect the victims to friends and or relatives who do have criminal
or anti-social backgrounds.
So, we will wait with batted breath for April 25th.
Attend the Timbuktu Learning Center’s weekly Thursday Night Community
Forums. All Forums are held at the House of the Lord Church from 7pm
Join Operation Life Line if you need assistance or know someone who
needs assistance with their mortgages as it relates to foreclosures,
predatory lending and/or subprime lending.
Attend NRLAA’s monthly forum Focus on Africa the 2nd Saturday
from 2pm to 4pm.
Organizing Meetings regarding Darfur every Thursday - 12noon @ the House
of the Lord Church
Keep abreast of our Darfurian activities by checking our web page @
NEED QUALITY CHILD CARE? – Call the Alonzo A.
Daughtry Memorial Daycare Center Located at 333 Second Street, (Between
4th & 5th Avenues) downtown Brooklyn, NY (718) 499-2066. Immediate
openings in a state of the arts center.